Should TITO lauch pre-emptive strikes a/ regions?

[ALP Hamelin]

Should TITO lauch pre-emptive strikes against region crashers?[/u]

*stands to the Council, with aides standing beside the Speaker --- Similar to that of the Canadian/British Parliaments*

"The discussion/debate is open to the Council.
Please follow the rules.."

[ALP Hamelin]

The Council will recognize the Honourable Leader of the UDA Party; The Armed Republic of Klington representative...

[ALP Hamelin]

(Moved)

(Stands) "Mr.Speaker I firmly believe we should launch pre-emptive strikes on region crashers, but this should be examined much more closely then a regular defensive move-in.
Of course non-TITO nations should play a bigger role here in 10000 Islands, just not in the goverment

[Boktavia]

The representative from Boktavia wishes to speak, Mr. Speaker.

[Anceltierre]

as does the anceltierrian rep

[ALP Hamelin]

*stands*
The Honourable Deputy Leader nation Boktavia

then to the
Honourable member for Anceltierre

*sits*

[Boktavia]

Mr. Speaker, Boktavia wishes to say that we are all for pre-emptive strikes, but we must insist that ONLY if there is definite evidence. The invasion of Iraq is an example of what we would consider not enough evidence. But we do understand that in nationstates things go faster, and we will take that into consideration as well.

On the non-TITO issue, I believe that non-TITO nations should of course play a bigger part in 10000 Islands. But I feel that they should have a part in the government. If they do not get the opportunity to be in the government, then why will they feel a need to participate? And where will they participate? I feel that it is possible to play a strong role in the government without necessarly being part of TITO!

[ALP Hamelin]

*stands, while Pages stand on the side*
Im sure the Honourable Deputy Leader will keep in mind that the issue at hand does not reflect that of the Iraqi War.

I am sure the rep. of the Deputy Leader will state it's nation's interest of it in plain fashion, most likly using a TITO issue?

*The floor goes back to Boktavia*
*then to the Honourable Aldeer

[Boktavia]

Forgive me, I probably should have used a TITO example. I cannot realy think of anything I have been involved in, but here is a hypothetical example: If some nation comes to us, screaming on the message board that an invader region is planning to attack some other region, they must have evidence. Boktavia is not a nation that will go rushing of without any proof of said invasion. Actual posts on the message board of the invader region, confirming the invasion, would be considered proof for me. Intercepted telegrams, too, though I would not trust those as much as the posts, as they can be forged. Also, if the region that is being invaded expressly asks us not to help, as France did in the Farktopia issue, we must stand aside. Basically I am saying that TITO can and should use pre-emptive strikes, if there is sufficient evidence. I am sorry if I caused some confusion.

[Anceltierre]

Mr. speaker, I would for the most part agree with Boktavia's stand point. If TITO used pre-emptive attacks we would need sufucient evidence, and to be frank, if we didn't we would just be one BIG bunch of region crashers

[ALP Hamelin]

*nods and stands*
As this has been stated by two respective members in this Chamber, unless their is any other states who wish to object to the issue of both the oppinions of the Deputy and Aldeer, then I see no reason to hold back any objection, to allow the floor be opened for the statement of the Deputy Leader, be the opinion of the UDA Party...

Is there a Seconder? or a Point of Order to object?

*sits*

[ALP Hamelin]

voting members have the floor*

[Anceltierre]

Yes, you have a seconder.

[ALP Hamelin]

All for the Honourable Deputy Leader's statements as issued earlier, to be the stance of the UDA Party?

**vote**

[Anceltierre]

*Yay or Nay?... Ohwell*

Yay